The Magic Of Merlin Olsen

Merlin Olsen died this week. He had been battling cancer for the past couple of years, so it wasn’t a surprise that he had passed away. What was surprising was his age.

Merlin Olsen was 69. Which seems impossible … since it seemed like he had been around forever.

In 1968, Olsen sang “Under the Boardwalk” with his Los Angeles Rams defensive linemates (known as the “Fearsome Foursome”) on ABC’s “The Hollywood Palace” variety show. Variety shows were big back then, and the “Hollywood Palace” attracted every name star of the day to its stage. The “Palace” doesn’t exist anymore, and the Rams — no longer in Los Angeles — are anything but fearsome these days.

Merlin Olsen

Merlin Olsen

Olsen, a college and professionall Hall of Fame football player, made the jump to the TV broadcast booth in the late 1970s and, as a sidelight, became an actor. He played good old boys and tough guys in movies, but found a home on “Little House on the Prairie” as Michael Landon’s sidekick Jonathan Garvey. Landon, who knew all about acting alongside big softies from his days with Dan “Hoss” Blocker on  “Bonanza,” developed a brotherly rivalry with Olsen.

After “Little House,” Olsen went on to “Father Murphy” and “Aaron’s Way,” each less successful but which kept his face in front of viewers. At the same time, Olsen became the unlikely TV spokesman for FTD florists — a big guy talking about budding bouquets or holding a dozen roses.

We don’t have celebrities like Merlin Olsen today. We have fast-rising young stars who are often replaced in a few years by other fast-rising younger stars. Today’s TV stars more often than not try to do other series (and mostly fail) and if they do TV ads at all, it’s voice-over narration so as to ikeep their identity a guessing game.

They’ll do the late-night talk shows … but mostly to promote their latest endeavour, not entertain. And we know so much about our sports heroes these days, they’re so controlled by agents and media handlers, that you can’t imagine of one taking Merlin Olsen’s path through celebrityland.

For some reason, Olsen’s death made me think of Neil Patrick Harris opening the Oscars with a song-and-dance number. Harris was “Doogie Howser, M.D.”; now he’s Barney on “How I Met Your Mother.” He’s hosted the Emmys and the Tonys, and has become a cult favorite with movies such as “Starship Troopers” and “Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle” … and on the Internet with such projects as “Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog.”

It isn’t a stretch to imagine Neil Patrick Harris on “The Hollywood Palace.” Like Merlin Olsen, he appears to be someone who’ll just seem to have been around forever.

Posted in Uncategorized | 0 Comments

Things We Might Not Want To Know

I’m not kidding. There are things you might not want to know and, frankly, things I wish I didn’t know. And some of those will be revealed over the next few paragraphs. So, if you’re the squeamish type, I’ll understand it if you decide to move along. Thanks for the page hit; we’ll catch up later.

It used to be that in order to hear about … well, for lack of a better word … icky stuff, you’d have to get an Afterschool Special or a Movie of the Week. Some medical disorder never discussed by Marcus Welby or afflicting any of The Waltons would be contained to a lovely two-hour block of TV time that, if you chose to, you could ignore.

Take, for instance, the 1976 film “The Loneliest Runner.” Written, directed by, produced by and co-starring Michael Landon, the TV film told the story of a teen who grows up to become an Olympic runner. Safe enough, right? HA!  The reason the boy becomes a star athlete is that he’d run home from school every day because his mother would hang his bedsheets out the window of their home every time he wet the bed. Landon, to his credit, said it was a story born from his own experiences.

And while the movie helped humanize the trauma, it broke open the door to what could be talked about on TV. Daytime talk shows, of course, routinely include material so seemingly private as to make bed-wetting seem quaint. Athletes and presidential candidates have made commercials about the benefits of pills to counteract erectile dysfunction.

Name a body part and — at some point during the day — you more than likely can find a commercial, talk show or sitcom discussing what spews from it. One infomercial for a colon-cleaning supplement details the final days of John Wayne. … Don’t ask. … Really, don’t.

Now this isn’t to say that earwax and bellybutton lint (and more severe issues) aren’t important to know about or, at times, in need of appropriate treatment. Of course they are. And maybe this sounds a tad too puritanical or old-fashioned or stigma-bound, but … there really ARE some things we’d rather not hit us smack in the face on our widescreens at dinnertime.

The latest incarnation of this phenomenon comes courtesy of Whoopi Goldberg, who is now the spokeswoman for something know as LBL … “light bladder leakage.” In commercials and a series of short, humorous videos on the “1 in 3 Like Me” Web site, the Oscar-winning co-host of “The View” bonds with those who suffer from the condition while donning the charcaters of Eve, the Statue Of Liberty, Lady Godiva and others. Although the concept of the Statue of Liberty being afflicted by such problems takes some imagination to envision.

The Web site dispenses advice, both medical and personal, includes testimonials from women whose lives have been affected by LBL, and links to products that can help deal with the condition. All of which is well, and good, and necessary.

At the same time, it further breaks down the fourth wall between those who entertain us and the messy realities of life. Our loss, and our gain.

Posted in Uncategorized | 0 Comments

And the Oscar might go to …

It’s Oscar weekend and if you’re interested in that sort of thing, you’ve probably been reading all about which films and performances are more than likely to be given Academy Awards on Sunday night.

Anyone can predict the Oscar winners … heck, even YOU can predict the winners. But what fun is that? Read enough prognostications and you can be relatively successful … until something like Foreign Film or Cinematography puts the whammy on your ballot.

Far better to have that one or two predictions in the big categories that set you apart from the crowd (or at least into the small group of those who thought outside the ballot box). So, here’s your chance. Free and unsolicited, alternative choices in the Top 10 categories for this year’s Academy Awards.

Sound effects editing? Sorry, you’re on your own.

Best Adapted Screenplay: The smart money here has been on “Up In The Air,” as a way to acknowledge what had been a prime contender for much of the Oscar season. But there’s another film here that has generated a lot of goodwill that might get shut out as well and that’s “An Education.” The screenplay is by Nick Hornby, a brilliant writer whose novels have been made into films by several of those who will be voting.

Best Original Screenplay: Quentin Tarrantino would seem a shoo-in here for “Inglourious Basterds.” Don’t buy into it. One of the most clever screenplays of the year was for the animated film “Up,” with its depiction of growing old with and without the one you love.

Animated Feature: “Up,” of course, is nominated for Best Picture, so it’s a lock in this category … NOT. One of the independent darlings of Hollywood is director/writer Wes Anderson, and the Academy can find a way to honor him by giving the win in this category to “The Fantastic Mr. Fox,” which might have been the better film anyway.

Foreign Film: This prize is headed for “The White Ribbon” from Germany. And then, at the last moment, here comes “The Milk of Sorrow” from Peru to snatch it away. Why? Because the Academy likes to spread this category out among as many countries as possible; and Peru hasn’t been a hotbed of filmmaking.

Best Supporting Actor: Since “Inglourious Basterds” premiered, Christoph Waltz was headed for this prize. he’s won every conceivable award for his performance. The single, most-likely winner Sunday night … and he’ll lose … to Christopher Plummer (”The Last Station”). At age 80, after a brilliant career, Plummer has received his first nomination. This has classic upset written all over it.

Best Supporting Actress: As with the writing award for “Up in the Air,” here’s where “Precious” was a cinch to be recognized, for the performance of Mo’Nique, who like Waltz has won every award until this point. But Maggie Gyllenhaal was a surprise nominee for “Crazy Heart” and has been an indie-film icon for years. Just sayin’ …

Best Actor: Jeff Bridges, of course, for “Crazy Heart.” I look at this category and think of the year that Nicholson, Cage, Day-Lewis and Caine were nominated … and Adrian Brody won the Oscar. Four established stars are in the field here (Clooney, Freeman, Firth and Bridges), while Jeremy Renner was the heartbeat of the much-admired “The Hurt Locker.”

Best Actress: Meryl Streep (”Julie & Julia”) hasn’t won an Oscar in 27 years. Sandra Bullock (”The Blind Side”) is a well-loved Hollywood survivor. The pair have won every award except the Cy Young until this point and the race is thought to be too close to call. Which is why the winner will be Gabourey Sidibe in “Precious.” She made what could have been a film unbearable to watch into an engrossing moment of viewer empathy.

Best Director: This one also has been carved in stone for months, Kathryn Bigelow for “The Hurt Locker.” The Academy has even lined up Barbra Streisand to present this award, so sure it is that Bigelow will win. However, no film this year had the stamp of auteur placed on it as Quentin Tarrantino’s “Inglourious Basterds,” and one of the mavericks of Hollywood gets payback with the prize he should have won for “Pulp Fiction.”

Best Picture: “Avatar” or “The Hurt Locker,” that’s been the question during the parade of award shows and critics prizes. But the weighted voting system will come into play here, and the film that seems to be everyone’s second choice, “Inglouious Basterds,” will keep piling up points as the others fall by the wayside.

How many of these predictions will prove correct? If I knew that, I’d be in Vegas.

Posted in Uncategorized | 0 Comments

All of them had hair of gold …

There are certain cultural touchstones that appear destined never to go away. “Hamlet,” for instance. The Beatles, certainly. “Star Trek,” “Catcher in the Rye,” “Through the Looking Glass,” “The Road Not Taken,” the Mona Lisa … all examples of comets forever crossing the horizon of popular culture, only to return time and time again.

Then, there’s “The Brady Bunch.”

The original series went off the air in 1974, and yet the blended family of squabbling siblings wouldn’t go away. They did a variety show (!) with song and dance numbers and retina-burning day-glo costumes. They did a slew of sappy TV movies. They did a sitcom about Marcia and Jan and their husbands sharing a house. They tried a dramatic interpretation of the show, “The Bradys,” that featured job loss, alcoholism, marital woes and little Bobby Brady paralyzed in a stock car race.

People still tuned in. Some of the kids tried music careers, some left the business completely and one — Christopher Knight, who played Peter — went the reality show route in a show (”My Fair Brady”) that detailed his courtship and marriage to another reality show type.

People still tune in. Hollywood made a satirical film of the show … and it turned out to be a hit. The Bradys still wouldn’t go away. They’re a staple of TV Land, have made cameo appearances as their characters in movies and music videos, and have written more than their share of memoirs.

The latest chapter in the saga played out this week when the six now-grown Brady children were to be part of a week-long series of reunions on NBC’s “Today” show. It wasn’t to be, however, because of a long-standing feud between Marcia and Jan.

Yup, they’re STILL fighting.

According to various media reports, Jan (Eve Plumb) is upset at oldest sister Marcia, Marcia, Marcia (Maureen McCormick) for veiled references to a shared kiss between the actresses that McCormick wrote in her memoir (”Here’s the story …”) and led to rumors of a lesbian relationship.

And so, the two women aren’t speaking and one (or both) refused to share the “Today” spot with the other. (It’s right about here that Carol would march the girls into Mike’s architectural office in the split level and he’d homily the problem away.)

According to Mail Tribune theater critic Bill Varble, the new “Hamlet” at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival is stellar. The music of the Beatles continues to be re-issued in varied formats. The latest “Star Trek” film jump-started the franchise and there’s a 3-D version of “Alice in Wonderland” on the way.

But you don’t really have to reinvent “The Brady Bunch” to understand its cultural significance. You just have to have been a kid at some stage of your life, and it all makes sense.

Posted in Uncategorized | 0 Comments

Miss Piggy would kill for this kind of publicity

Let’s turn our attention to Colorado Springs, Colorado, where an advertisement for the March presentation by the touring company of the Tony Award winning musical “Avenue Q” has been found to be in bad taste. 

Puppet CleavageThe ad, shown here, features the character of Lucy T. (for The) Slut, who is described as ”a sexy, promiscuous nightclub singer. She seduces Princeton and subsequently leaves him, and in the process is sent to the hospital after Kate unintentionally drops a penny on her head from the top of the Empire State Building.” She later becomes a born-again Christian and reaffirms her chastity.

You can see whay such a character would be troublesome for the good people of Colorado Springs, although it must be noted that the poster (which has since been replaced) is marked “CENSORED” contains a warning about adult themes and notes that “Avenue Q,” with a book by Coos Bay native Jeff Whitty, is not intended for children. The poster notes the show contains “60 percent adult situations, 40 percent foam rubber.”

Yes …. LUCY IS A PUPPET!

The good folks at the advertising company decided that the good folks of Colorado Springs were unable to handle foam rubber covered by bright pink, fuzzy material. You’d think in the home of the Rocky Mountains, they’d understand.

“We were in the process of putting (the poster) on the presses when one of the top execs saw it and said, ‘I don’t think it’s appropriate for the Colorado Springs market,’” says Kristy Maple, marketing director for the entertainment company that produces the “Broadway in Colorado Springs” series.

“It’s the fact that it’s cleavage,” Moore told the Colorado Springs Gazette.

Puppet cleavage and all, “Avenue Q” will go on, March 16-17 at the Pike’s Peak Center. … Yes, the Pike’s Peak Center.

Posted in Uncategorized | 0 Comments

The Man In Black Returns

Johnny Cash has a new album out this week, a remarkable achievement for a man who would be celebrating his 78th birthday on Friday had he not died in 2003.

The album, “Cash: American VI This Ain’t No Grave” is the final installment (or so we’re told) of the collaboration between the legendary performer and acclaimed producer Rick Rubin. The half-dozen discs have been that rarity in music (or, perhaps, in any art form) … they are more dramatic, more intimate and more expressive of human nature than what came earlier in in the artist’s career.

And when you’re talking about someone whose career was as stellar as Johnny Cash, that’s extraordinary to consider.

What makes the American Recordings series work is Cash’s commitment (and Rubin’s restraint) to putting the performer front and center in a way that — in this voice-enhancer era — makes the listener all too aware of an aging man’s frailty. When an artist is willing to show us his soul, it (momentarily, at least) gives us pause to search for our own.

The most-famous of the Cash recordings during this period is his award-winning cover of the Nine Inch Nails song “Hurt.” The cuts I’ve heard on the new disc don’t quite reach that level, although his line readings on Tom Paxton’s “I Can’t Help But Wonder Where I’m Bound” are filled with the mood of prescient mortality that marked the strongest of Cash’s final recordings.

Many times, posthumous releases of an artist’s work can seem unwarranted. But that’s not the case here. The final songs of Johnny Cash betray his health and slow our breath but, in their fragile artistry, that just might be the point.

Posted in Uncategorized | 0 Comments

Two thumbs … way up

It’s hardly an original thought to say that we learn as much (or more) about heroes by how they handle adversity as how they handle success. And rarely have we been handed an opportunity to look at two such cases side-by-side as we were this week.

Tiger Woods emerged from months of seclusion and a media blackout to hold a televised gathering (without questions), expressing his remorse over the serial infidelity that tore apart his marriage, his image and his credibility. Viewers were treated to what Woods wanted to say, when he wanted to say it and how he wanted it presented.

No matter how sincere you might think it comes across, make no mistake: It was a programmed event with a rehearsed statement. Woods is young, and healthy, and adored by millions. There’s every chance he will be able to restore his stature, if not his marriage.

Also this week, film critic Roger Ebert was the subject of a gripping, deeply intimate profile in Esquire magazine that in no hidden terms discussed Ebert’s long battle with cancer and the operations that have robbed him of the ability to talk, eat and drink. 

 Instead, following more surgery to stop a relentless bloodletting, he was left without much of his mandible, his chin hanging loosely like a drawn curtain, and behind his chin there was a hole the size of a plum. He also underwent a tracheostomy, because there was still a risk that he could drown in his own blood.

Roger Ebert in Esquire magazine

Roger Ebert in Esquire magazine

 Ebert’s strength, and that of his wife Chaz, come through in the piece. He is funny, angry, frustrated and still very interested in working. On his blog in reaction to the story, Ebert discusses his reasons for agreeing to exposing his condition.

I knew I’d have to play fair. I’ve done interviews for years. This was no time to get sensitive and ask for photo approval, or an advance look at the piece. I’d been the goose, and now it was my turn to be the gander. … I was a little surprised at the detail the article went into about the nature and extent of my wounds and the realities of my appearance, but what the hell. It was true. I didn’t need polite fictions.

Perhaps there’s a humility and humanity in those going through physical deterioration that allows them to take down the pretense. You think of Patrick Swayze, and Farrah Fawcett; of Arthur Ashe and former Bush White House spokesman Tony Snow. By removing the trappings of celebrity, they remind us (and, maybe, themselves) of the equanimity of life.

With luck, and time, perhaps Tiger Woods will shed those trappings as well.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 0 Comments

These people deserve each other

It’s been a tad difficult to watch NBC’s new show “The Marriage Ref” in between all the breakaways for the Winter Olympics, but here’s what we’ve gather thus far:

1. It’s hosted by some guy you’ve never heard of who is give less screen time than the panel of celebrity experts

2. The celebrity experts include show producer Jerry Seinfeld, who began dating his now-wife after she had returned from a three-week honeymoon with her new husband. Another expert is Alec Baldwin, whose divorce from Kim Basinger is the stuff of melodramatic legend. Future announced experts include Sarah Silverman, Ricky Gervais and Madonna.

3. Another ref will be Kelly Ripa, who actually might be able to offer advice on staying in a relationship with an obnoxious spouse, based on the 10 years she’s spent with Regis Philbin.

4. Married couples who agree to go on this show and have their lives dissected by celebrities get what they deserve.

Speaking of Madonna, guess who has published a list of the Top 10 Albums of all time? Yup …the Holy See’s official newspaper, L’ Osservatore Romano. The Vatican, never one to be seen as a supporter of rock music, lists Michael Jackson’s “Thriller,” U2’s “Achtung Baby” and the Beatles’ “Revolver” among its choices.

Madonna herself didn’t make the cut. Neither does Bob Dylan who, according to the Vatican,  ”despite his “great poetic vein because he paved the way for generations of unprofessional singer-songwriters who have harshly tested the ears and patience of listeners with their tormented stories.”

While “Saturday Night Live” was still funny, it ran a fake commercial for an “experimental” razor that went beyond the usual two blades to add a third blade. In another example of art imitating imitation, movie-lovers in Korea can now see “Avatar” in their choice of 2-D, 3-D and, yes, 4-D! What’s the “fourth” dimension? Try moving seats, smells of explosives, sprinkling water, laser lights and wind effects. In 5-D, moviegoers are seated in balloons.

The SyFy network, which revels in original programming that are either High Art or High Camp, might be hitting an all-time high with the announcement that famed cult filmmaker Roger Corman will produce the long-awaited Sharktopus! There’s now quite a debate as to how the legendary creature would kill and how many mouths and tentacles it will have, but early speculation is that it will look like a cross between Alec Baldwin and Kim Basinger.

Posted in Uncategorized | 0 Comments

Imagine if we picked a president this way …

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the group behind the Oscars, spelled out this week exactly how the Academy Award for Best Picture will be decided. My suggestion? … Beat the rush, take your preferred headache remedy before continuing.

With the shift to 10 Best Picture nominees this year, the Academy has asked its 5,777 voting members to list the 10 nominees (even “The Blind Side”) in order of preference from 1 to 10. … HOWEVER, voters are not required to do so. That’s an important distinction, because say, you love “Avatar” and want it to win. Why rank the rest, when the their position could help “The Hurt Locker” to beat “Avatar”?

And it could; here’s why: After all 5,777 ballots are returned, two accountants from the Florida Elections Commission will be locked in a room with six pizzas, a 24-pack of Red Bull and a porta-potty. They will separate the ballots into stacks, based on which film was voted No. 1. If the film with the most first-place has 2,889 votes, it wins. You ever try to get 2,889 people to agree on anything, except maybe that Kevin Costner was a lousy Robin Hood?

So, the two guys with their pizzas will take the shortest stack of ballots and disperse them among the other movie stacks … according to what was the No. 2 choice on the ballot. Let’s say “A Serious Man” finishes 10th. Where are the No. 2 votes of folks who like the Coen Bros. likely to go? My guess … to “Inglourious Basterds.”

Votes for “District 9″ are likely to have “Avatar” rated highly. The voter who chose “An Education” in first might have looked at the rest of the field and not voted anything in the 2-10 slots. And, is there any doubt that “Avatar” director James Cameron will have “The Hurt Locker” and “Inglourious Basterds” in the the 9-10 positions?

Anyway, the dispersal of the losing film ballots will continue until one film has more than 50 percent of the vote. That exact number will depend, though, on single-vote ballots. If a ballot votes for “Up In The Air” and nothing else, the ballot total (and thus the number need to win) decreases.

It’s highly possible that a film will win Best Picture EVEN THOUGH it has a smaller number of first-place votes. So, if 2,887 voters love “Precious” it could be caught from behind due to all those second-place votes from short-stacked films. We’ll never know, though, since the Academy won’t release the vote totals.

There’s got to be a better way to do this. Until then, for the sake of argument, here’s a preliminary look at how I’d rank them.

1. The Hurt Locker; 2. Up in the Air; 3. Inglourious Basterds; 4. Avatar; 5. Up; 6. Precious; 7. An Education; 8. District 9; 9. A Serious Man; 10 The Blind Side.

I could change my mind between now and the awards show on March 7. Feel free to post your own list.

Posted in Uncategorized | 0 Comments

Would you buy a cell phone from Eric Clapton?

When it comes to TV commericals, the more famous the face making the sales pitch, the less likely some of us are to believe them. Well, except Shatner, of course.

I don’t understand how a singing, dancing Brad Garrett is going to convince me to buy a soft drink; or how that guy who used to be the president on “24″ knows I’m going to be in good hands if I change insurance companies. And, look, who doesn’t love Betty White? But do you really think she knows what the dog food tastes like that she pushes 24 hours a day?

This brings us to Eric Clapton, who is one of the last people I suspect many of his fans would think they’d see pitching cell phones. I mean, it’s not the now-legendary moment wherein Bob Dylan became a huckster for Victoria’s Secret, but Clapton’s ad for a special, limited edition cell phone is fairly high on the whattheheck-o-meter.

Surely, you’d think, someone with Clapton’s cache must be doing this for the sake of some charity, right? Wrong, and don’t call me Shirley. It’s just another item available through the Eric Clapton store, along with T-shirts, albums, key chains … and a four-cup espresso set. He might have a rock and roll heart, but apparently he needs the cash.

When it comes to musicians as TV pitchman, give me those freecreditreport.com guys anyday.

 Speaking of commercials, last week we joked that the era of detente on the airways might lead to an on-air reunion of David Letterman, Jay Leno and Conan O’Brien. How close that came to being true. The CBS promo spot that aired during the Super Bowl featuring Letterman, Leno and Oprah (you really need a last name?), almost did feature O’Brien as well. Logistics apparently prevented the unemployed talk-show host from getting there. 

NFL legends Jerry Rice and Emmitt Smith were chosen for induction into the Hall of Fame over the weekend. They’ve both been on teams which won multiple Super Bowls and now they go into the Hall together. But Smith still has the better of Rice, since he won “Dancing With The Stars” while Rice finished second. Ah, Emmitt, who can forget your channeling of MC Hammer for the freestyle routine in the finals?

One final football-related note: The Super Bowl became the highest-rated TV show in history, surpassing the finale of M*A*S*H. The two do have something in common: The M*A*S*H finale included a bomb blast that left Father Mulcahy deaf; the Super Bowl had The Who.

Movie casting news No. 1: Brad Pitt, who last rode high in the saddle as Jesse James, is apparently the front-runner to portray Marshal Matt Dillon in the film version of “Gunsmoke.” Personally, I think it’s a great idea … if they cast Jennifer Aniston as Miss Kitty. On second thought, why don’t they just cast Matt Dillon as Matt Dillon?

Movie casting news No. 2: Michael Douglas, currently involved with the sequel to “Wall Street,” has agreed to star in director Steven Soderbergh’s film bio of – wait for it – Liberace.  Now, while the young folks rush to Wikipedia to discover just who Liberace was, the other bit of casting for the film is that Matt Damon will portray the flamboyant pianist’s late-in-life love interest.

 425_liberace_douglas_damon_lc_091609

 Now, here’s what you call a segue: What do you do after a book about a yuppie (remember them?) investment banker (remember them?) who becomes a serial killer is turned into a dark comedy slasher film (remember them?)? Well, if the book is Bret Easton Ellis’ “American Psycho,” there’s only one place to go … Broadway. Yup, they’re turning it into a musical! An American “Sweeney Todd” … without the pies.

Posted in Uncategorized | 0 Comments